#30565: Close StreamingHttpResponse content immediately after iterating it
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Chris Jerdonek       |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:                       |                   Status:  new
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  HTTP handling        |                  Version:  master
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  HttpResponse,        |             Triage Stage:
  streaming, StreamingHttpResponse   |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by Chris Jerdonek):

 > We're saying that's not the case?

 A few comments on this. My first idea to make sure my content stream was
 closed was to subclass `StreamingHttpResponse` and close my content stream
 inside a new  `StreamingHttpResponse.close()` implementation, precisely
 because of that code comment you found. But then I found that
 `HttpResponseBase.close()` wasn't getting called for some reason. Indeed,
 `HttpResponseBase.close()` already calls `close()` on everything inside
 `self._closable_objects`, so it shouldn't have been necessary for me to
 subclass `StreamingHttpResponse` if `HttpResponseBase.close()` was already
 getting called.

 And then I saw the [https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25725#comment:1
 comment] in #25725 saying:

 > If i remember Jacob's talk correctly not even all WSGI server call
 close.

 So I thought that was the coming into play.

 But now I'm seeing that when I use the approach I suggested of wrapping
 the content stream with an iterator that closes the underlying content
 stream immediately after it has been exhausted, `HttpResponseBase.close()`
 ''does'' get closed. In other words, not closing the underlying content
 stream was causing `HttpResponseBase.close()` not to be called.

 So there's an argument for what I'm suggesting independent of whether
 `HttpResponseBase.close()` can be relied upon to close. Put another way,
 implementing what I'm suggesting helps that code comment be true, at least
 in the case I ran into.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30565#comment:4>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/067.98504973510f3e2fe2433910a1358f4f%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to