#30841: Using __isnull lookup to a non-boolean value doesn't promote join.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  André Ericson        |                    Owner:  André
                                     |  Ericson
         Type:  New feature          |                   Status:  closed
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  master
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  wontfix
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by André Ericson):

 Replying to [comment:5 felixxm]:
 > After the reconsideration I don't think that we should change this
 [https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/ref/models/querysets/#isnull
 documented] behavior (that is in Django from the very beginning).
 `__isnull` lookup expects boolean values in many places and IMO it would
 be confusing if we'll allow for truthy/falsy values, e.g. take a look at
 these examples `field__isnull='false'` or `field__isnull='true'` (both
 would return the same result). You can always call `bool()` on a right
 hand side.
 >
 > Sorry for my previous acceptation (I shouldn't triage tickets in the
 weekend).

 I understand your point. But is there anything we can do to avoid people
 falling for the same pitfall I did? The problem, in my opinion, is that it
 works fine for simple queries but as soon as you add a join that needs
 promotion it will break, silently. Maybe we should make it raise an
 exception when a non-boolean is passed?

 One valid example is to have a class that implements `__bool__`.

 You can see here
 
https://github.com/django/django/blob/d9881a025c15d87b2a7883ee50771117450ea90d/django/db/models/lookups.py#L465-L470
 that non-bool value is converted to IS NULL and IS NOT NULL already using
 the truthy/falsy values.

 > IMO it would be confusing if we'll allow for truthy/falsy values, e.g.
 take a look at these examples field__isnull='false' or
 field__isnull='true' (both would return the same result).
 This is already the case. It just is inconsistent, in `lookups.py`
 `field__isnull='false' ` will be a positive condition but on the
 `query.py` it will be the negative condition.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30841#comment:6>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/066.f6714f4d7dd6891fb993316cbf75a108%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to