#31315: Closing all connections in function tagged with @transaction_atomic or
transaction atomic block breaks atomicity
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  David Eling          |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  closed
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  2.1
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  wontfix
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Carlton Gibson):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => wontfix


Comment:

 Hi David. Thanks for the report. Interesting... :)

 I think this is expected behaviour.
 [https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/topics/db/sql/#connections-and-
 cursors The docs go as far as]:

 > `connection` and `cursor` mostly implement the standard Python DB-API
 described in PEP 249

 [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/#Connection.close That defines
 the behaviour for `close()`]:

 > Note that closing a connection without committing the changes first will
 cause an implicit rollback to be performed.

 
[https://github.com/django/django/blob/d4fff711d4c97356bd6ba1273d2a5e349326eb5f/django/db/backends/base/base.py#L296-L298
 Looking at the code], we have exactly that:

 {{{
             if self.in_atomic_block:
                 self.closed_in_transaction = True
                 self.needs_rollback = True
 }}}


 > Within our code base we had to isolate the offending bit and do it
 before entering the atomic block.

 I think that's the right approach. My first guess reading this would be
 that closing the connection inside a transaction would be at best
 undefined. ''What do I expect to happen there?'' — I could see a few
 answers to that. That it's ''rollback'' is no real surprise.

 I hope that makes sense?

 Kind Regards,

 Carlton

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/31315#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/065.25d299b270e40dc7ab643c68757ff1eb%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to