#31591: Spanning relationship backwards when related_name is used.
     Reporter:  Nat S Dunn           |                    Owner:  Carlton
         Type:                       |  Gibson
  Cleanup/optimization               |                   Status:  assigned
    Component:  Documentation        |                  Version:  3.0
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  related_name         |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
Changes (by Carlton Gibson):

 * owner:  nobody => Carlton Gibson
 * status:  new => assigned
 * has_patch:  0 => 1
 * stage:  Unreviewed => Accepted


 OK, yes. Good spot.

 The docs should probably cross-reference
 relationships-backward here.

 At the least it's lowercased + `_set`, so correcting the examples to match
 the sample models at the top would probably also ease confusion.

 [https://github.com/django/django/pull/12935 PR]

Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/31591#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to