#27807: Overriding username validators doesn't work as documented
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  johnrork             |                    Owner:  Shekhar
                                     |  Nath Gyanwali
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  closed
    Component:  contrib.auth         |                  Version:  1.10
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  wontfix
     Keywords:  validation auth      |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
  login forms username               |
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Carlton Gibson):

 * status:  assigned => closed
 * resolution:   => wontfix


Comment:

 I'm going to close this as wontfix. The issue doesn't justify new settings
 or signals or extensions to the validator API or and so on.

 `UnicodeUsernameValidator` is a good default, and ''Use a custom user
 model'' is not unreasonable. People who can't do that can add validation
 at the form level, in `clean()`, or even monkey-patch the field if they
 absolutely must, but flexibility for it's own sake is not worth
 significant complication here.

 Happy to look at a patch that is small and self-contained, but generally
 the whole issue seems moot.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27807#comment:29>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/066.0bb4e4349a8cc13c738f4bbb6d877b6f%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to