#32281: Prefetech Object - to_attr has ambiguous behavior when using a related
lookup
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Tal Perry            |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  New feature          |                   Status:  closed
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  3.1
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  wontfix
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Mariusz Felisiak):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => wontfix
 * component:  Uncategorized => Database layer (models, ORM)
 * type:  Uncategorized => New feature


Old description:

> **Code Example**
> {{{
> from django.db.models import Prefetch
>
> p = Prefetch("a_set", to_attr="my_a")
> assert p.prefetch_to == "my_a"
>
> p = Prefetch("b__a_set", to_attr="my_a")
> assert p.prefetch_to == "my_a", p.prefetch_to
>
> }}}
>
> That last assertion fails because p.prefetch_to == "b__my_a"
>
> **Description and use case**
> We have a models X, Y and Z
> Z has a foreign key to Y and Y has a foreign key to Z
> We'd like to fetch X with all of it's Z's using prefetch related and to
> be able to set the attribute to "z"
>
> But as above, this doesn't seem to work.
>
> The
> [https://github.com/django/django/blob/bb64b99b78a579cb2f6178011a4cf9366e634438/django/db/models/query.py#L1570-L1587
> relevant Django code] seems to ignore this use case (or discourage it?)
> and instead puts to "z" attribute on each "Y"
>

> {{{
>             self.prefetch_to =
> LOOKUP_SEP.join(lookup.split(LOOKUP_SEP)[:-1] + [to_attr])
>
> }}}
>

>
> ----
>
> I assume "fixing this" is a breaking change, but could we do an explicit
> parameter for prefetch_to ?At the moment we're setting it manually after
> creating the prefetch object

New description:

 **Code Example**
 {{{
 from django.db.models import Prefetch

 p = Prefetch("a_set", to_attr="my_a")
 assert p.prefetch_to == "my_a"

 p = Prefetch("b__a_set", to_attr="my_a")
 assert p.prefetch_to == "my_a", p.prefetch_to

 }}}

 That last assertion fails because `p.prefetch_to == "b__my_a"`

 **Description and use case**
 We have a models X, Y and Z
 Z has a foreign key to Y and Y has a foreign key to Z
 We'd like to fetch X with all of it's Z's using prefetch related and to be
 able to set the attribute to "z"

 But as above, this doesn't seem to work.

 The
 
[https://github.com/django/django/blob/bb64b99b78a579cb2f6178011a4cf9366e634438/django/db/models/query.py#L1570-L1587
 relevant Django code] seems to ignore this use case (or discourage it?)
 and instead puts to "z" attribute on each "Y"


 {{{
             self.prefetch_to =
 LOOKUP_SEP.join(lookup.split(LOOKUP_SEP)[:-1] + [to_attr])

 }}}



 ----

 I assume "fixing this" is a breaking change, but could we do an explicit
 parameter for prefetch_to ?At the moment we're setting it manually after
 creating the prefetch object

--

Comment:

 Thanks for this ticket, however IMO this is an expected behavior. In the
 second example `a_set` is a field lookup on `b` so we can change its name
 to `my_a` (in `b`) but we cannot assign it directly to the main object, it
 will be misleading.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32281#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/066.3b3979c4b7ae5fe96a399933975489ae%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to