#32452: Simplify storing strings/bytes in a Storage
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Thomas Güttler | Owner: nobody
Type: New feature | Status: closed
Component: File | Version: 3.1
uploads/storage |
Severity: Normal | Resolution: wontfix
Keywords: | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Mariusz Felisiak):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
> Things would be bit easier, if save() would support strings/bytes
directly.
IMO it would be confusing. `Storage.save()` save content to the file, so
it supports files and any file-like objects, e.g. `StringIO` or `BytesIO`.
Making mocking easier is not a sufficient argument for me, it's also not
clear why this is much harder with the current API.
You can start a discussion on DevelopersMailingList if you don't agree.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32452#comment:3>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/065.68a72c9982309d20c23ec3f150f1afa7%40djangoproject.com.
