#32890: Consider ranking the documentation search results
-------------------------------------------+------------------------
               Reporter:  Roland van Laar  |          Owner:  nobody
                   Type:  Uncategorized    |         Status:  new
              Component:  Uncategorized    |        Version:  3.2
               Severity:  Normal           |       Keywords:
           Triage Stage:  Unreviewed       |      Has patch:  0
    Needs documentation:  0                |    Needs tests:  0
Patch needs improvement:  0                |  Easy pickings:  0
                  UI/UX:  0                |
-------------------------------------------+------------------------
 I had this experience this morning with the search results. My goals was
 to find the documentation on `on_delete`.

 - I searched for `on_delete`:
 https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/search/?q=on_delete

 There were 10 results displayed on the first page, and 11 pages in total.
 6 of those results were pre 2.x release notes.

 The most promising result was result number 10: `Model instance
 reference`. https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/ref/models/instances/

 Model instance reference doesn't have anything for on_delete on it's page.
 i.e. `Phrase not found` when searching

 I think Django is helped by a good search system for their documentation.
 Therefor, consider adding a ranking of sorts that ranks the documentation.

 - release notes are helpful when they are recent
 - pages that don't have the queried text on them is less helpful.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32890>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/051.99dabd9efe79070b97559efb505547dc%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to