#33331: Improve exception handling with `cursor.close()` after errors
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Daniel Hahler        |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:                       |                   Status:  closed
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  3.2
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  needsinfo
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by Daniel Hahler):

 Ok, fair enough - it is only fixing a regression on Python 3 then (for
 me), that was actually done as a workaround.

 I suggest reading the original tickets description maybe then: my
 intention was to not mask / "extend" the actual exception with more
 information (the (IMHO incorrectly chained) error during cleanup, that is
 expected to fail).  It is similar to a `file.close()` when it is expected
 that it wasn't created or its handler being invalid already.

 Replying to
 
https://github.com/django/django/commit/6b6be692fcd102436c7abef1d7b3fa1d37ad4bdf#r67292630:

 > The cleanup part of the chain adds noise to the actual source of the
 error, so maybe it can be improved. But that’s an improvement over the
 existing situation, not a regression.

 Ok, I see.  That's what I've meant to do: basically restoring the behavior
 with Python 3 (when the workaround for Python 2 was in place), while being
 a bit smarter to only ignore/swallow expected errors.
 I was not aware that the intention with the Python 2 workaround was to
 chain ("add useless noise") always with Python 3.

 The question here really is also: if you would know that the connection is
 invalid, and that `close()` would throw: would you call it in the first
 place?

 As for a new PR I'd rather update the existing one, but cannot re-open it
 as mentioned there.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/33331#comment:12>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/065.b98be212b2d500ea0a5e8dbc14782482%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to