#33683: Document HttpResponseBase and allow import from django.http
--------------------------------------+------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Collin Anderson       |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Cleanup/optimization  |                   Status:  new
    Component:  HTTP handling         |                  Version:  dev
     Severity:  Normal                |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                        |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  1                     |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                     |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                     |                    UI/UX:  0
--------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment (by Carlton Gibson):

 Hey Colin.

 There's a PEP here: [https://peps.python.org/pep-0544/ PEP 544 –
 Protocols: Structural Subtyping (Static Duck Typing)]

 The idea roughly being that you declare a protocol, which any class can
 conform to, and use that in your annotations, rather than requiring a
 specific subclass, since folks are used to passing any kind of object that
 responds appropriately.

 > Does Python typing allow... erm... retrofitting — that's probably not
 the word — protocol conformance? 🤔

 Reading from the PEP, on [https://peps.python.org/pep-0544/#explicitly-
 declaring-implementation Explicitly declaring implementation]:

 > Static analysis tools are expected to automatically detect that a class
 implements a given protocol. So while it’s possible to subclass a protocol
 explicitly, it’s not necessary to do so for the sake of type-checking.

 So... testing needed but... one would hope that a suitable Protocol
 definition would satisfy the type-checkers, without needing changes
 everywhere in the existing code.
 With `runtime_checkable()` it looks like that's usable with `isinstance()`
 too which might help avoid issues like #33362.

 None of this is necessary here — more just thinking how we move forward:
 documenting `HttpResponseBase` is fine I think.
 Thanks.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/33683#comment:4>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/01070180acb7f703-90c90ef2-a351-4a32-a4dd-765ae6461e8a-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to