#33755: Move ASGI body-file cleanup into ASGIRequest
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Carlton Gibson | Owner: Jonas
Type: | Lundberg
Cleanup/optimization | Status: assigned
Component: HTTP handling | Version: dev
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: ASGI | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Jonas Lundberg):
This in body, since read can be used passing a chunk size ...
Carlton, this is exactly my findings and thoughts as well :-D ... though
I'm leaning towards adding a noop {{{LimitedStream.close()}}} instead of
the {{{try...except}}} block.
Then, adding a simple close() to ASGIRequest...
Agree, this is probably enough instead of {{{__del__}}}, i.e. untouched
{{{request.body}}} will be closed and cleaned up by the response resource
closers.
I will open a PR shortly.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/33755#comment:9>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018126314201-a8de3e78-efc1-438b-93fb-52c92a9e342b-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.