#32948: Optimise Q combination and inversion
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Keryn Knight | Owner: Nick Pope
Type: | Status: assigned
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: Database layer | Version: dev
(models, ORM) |
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Ready for
| checkin
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Mariusz Felisiak <felisiak.mariusz@…>):
In [changeset:"9dff316be41847c505ebf397e4a52a0a71e0acc4" 9dff316b]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="9dff316be41847c505ebf397e4a52a0a71e0acc4"
Refs #32948, Refs #32946 -- Used Q.create() internally for dynamic Q()
objects.
Node.create() which has a compatible signature with Node.__init__()
takes in a single `children` argument rather than relying in unpacking
*args in Q.__init__() which calls Node.__init__().
In addition, we were often needing to unpack iterables into *args and
can instead pass a list direct to Node.create().
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32948#comment:14>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/010701823ed38d71-59ce798c-9429-44f8-b855-082e97330f7b-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
