#6655: Very little refactoring of get_svn_revision()
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: i_i | Owner: nobody
Status: closed | Component: Core framework
Version: SVN | Resolution: wontfix
Keywords: | Stage: Unreviewed
Has_patch: 1 | Needs_docs: 0
Needs_tests: 0 | Needs_better_patch: 0
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by mtredinnick):
* status: new => closed
* needs_better_patch: => 0
* resolution: => wontfix
* needs_tests: => 0
* needs_docs: => 0
Comment:
Probably not worth it. Realising that changes like this are always going
to be personal preference, I feel that this type of change obscures the
fact that path could be empty.
Opinions vary wildly in the Python community about this type of construct
(PEP 308 showing how inconclusive the consensus is).
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6655#comment:1>
Django Code <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
