#6390: File storage backend for Amazon S3
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  Gulopine  |                Owner:  nobody                
     Status:  new       |            Component:  Uncategorized         
    Version:  SVN       |           Resolution:                        
   Keywords:  fs-rf     |                Stage:  Design decision needed
  Has_patch:  1         |           Needs_docs:  1                     
Needs_tests:  1         |   Needs_better_patch:  1                     
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment (by wkornewald):

 After having compared Amazon's S3 library and boto's S3 module I have to
 say that neither of them is really great. Amazon can't stream, but unlike
 boto it supports EU buckets and virtual hosts. Also, boto has a lot of
 redundant code and adding EU bucket support (in a clean way) would require
 quite a few refactorings.

 Do you want the backend to make the browser upload via PUSH, so files
 don't have to be routed through the server (which would consume a lot of
 resources)? In that case, Amazon's library wins because boto's streaming
 support wouldn't be used. The best solution would of course be to merge
 boto with Amazon's library.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6390#comment:6>
Django Code <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to