#28438: Initial migration creates fields not listed in the migration if mixin 
class
changes
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Michal Dabski        |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Migrations           |                  Version:  1.11
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
  migration,models,mixin,postgresql  |
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by giannisterzopoulos):

 This seems to be still an issue. Here's couple of things that I am
 noticing:

 - There is, of course, no problem if you run `makemigrations` once in the
 end, after converting the Mixin into an abstract Model.

 - There is also no problem if you run `migrate` before changing the Mixin,
 and then `makemigrations` and `migrate` again.\\
   That actually results to the exact same migration as in the problematic
 case.

 Here is a test I wrote that can reproduce the issue, in case it can be
 helpful:

 {{{
 # <In tests.migrations.test_operations.OperationTests>
 def test_field_can_be_added_to_mixin_bases(self):
     # Replicating the scenario where a Mixin class has initially no fields
     # and does not extend Model; and then gets refactored to an abstract
 Model
     # with fields specified.
     class SomeMixin(models.Model):
         cuteness = models.IntegerField(null=True)

         class Meta:
             abstract = True

     operation = migrations.CreateModel(
         name='CutePony',
         fields=[
             ('id', models.AutoField(primary_key=True)),
             ('pink', models.IntegerField(default=3)),
         ],
         bases=(SomeMixin, models.Model),
     )
     app_label = 'test_28438'
     project_state, new_state = self.make_test_state(app_label, operation)
     with connection.schema_editor() as editor:
         operation.database_forwards(app_label, editor, project_state,
 new_state)
     project_state = new_state
     new_state = project_state.clone()
     operation = migrations.AddField(
         model_name='CutePony',
         name='cuteness',
         field=models.IntegerField(null=True)
     )
     operation.state_forwards(app_label, new_state)
     with connection.schema_editor() as editor:
         operation.database_forwards(app_label, editor, project_state,
 new_state)
     self.assertTableExists(f'{app_label}_cutepony')
 }}}
 (This raises: `django.db.utils.OperationalError: duplicate column name:
 cuteness`)

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28438#comment:11>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018b2470918c-b9f70ab8-9f4f-4821-ba17-5eda569c4633-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to