#7718: sorted() is used by system tests, but isn't available on Python 2.3
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: russellm | Owner: nobody
Status: new | Milestone: 1.0
Component: Unit test system | Version: SVN
Keywords: | Stage: Unreviewed
Has_patch: 0 |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
One of the proposed patches for #7303 correctly identified that sorted()
is not available under Python 2.3. sorted() is used extensively in the
Django system tests as a way of removing a dependency on dict ordering.
As at [7890], the following instances exist:
{{{
tests/modeltests/basic/models.py:>>> [sorted(d.items()) for d in dicts]
tests/modeltests/or_lookups/models.py:>>> [sorted(d.items()) for d in
dicts]
tests/regressiontests/admin_scripts/management/commands/app_command.py:
print 'EXECUTE:AppCommand app=%s, options=%s' % (app,
sorted(options.items()))
tests/regressiontests/admin_scripts/management/commands/base_command.py:
print 'EXECUTE:BaseCommand labels=%s, options=%s' % (labels,
sorted(options.items()))
tests/regressiontests/admin_scripts/management/commands/label_command.py:
print 'EXECUTE:LabelCommand label=%s, options=%s' % (label,
sorted(options.items()))
tests/regressiontests/admin_scripts/management/commands/noargs_command.py:
print 'EXECUTE:NoArgsCommand options=%s' % sorted(options.items())
tests/regressiontests/defaultfilters/tests.py:>>> [sorted(dict.items())
for dict in sorted_dicts]
tests/regressiontests/defaultfilters/tests.py:>>> [sorted(dict.items())
for dict in sorted_dicts]
tests/regressiontests/model_inheritance_regress/models.py:>>>
[sorted(d.items()) for d in dicts]
tests/regressiontests/model_inheritance_regress/models.py:>>>
[sorted(d.items()) for d in dicts]
tests/regressiontests/model_inheritance_regress/models.py:>>>
[sorted(d.items()) for d in dicts]
tests/regressiontests/model_inheritance_regress/models.py:>>>
[sorted(d.items()) for d in dicts]
tests/regressiontests/model_inheritance_regress/models.py:>>>
[sorted(d.items()) for d in dicts]
tests/regressiontests/model_inheritance_regress/models.py:>>>
[sorted(d.items()) for d in dicts]
tests/regressiontests/model_inheritance_regress/models.py:>>>
[sorted(d.items()) for d in dicts]
tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py:>>> [sorted(d.items()) for d in
dicts]
tests/regressiontests/queries/models.py:>>> [sorted(d.items()) for d in
dicts]
tests/regressiontests/utils/datastructures.py:>>>
sorted(real_dict.values())
}}}
We could just replace the use of sorted() with sort(); a better approach
(cleaner in terms of final output) would be to introduce a definition of
sorted() when it is not available, much in the same way that set is
imported when it is not available.
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7718>
Django Code <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
