#35348: Inconsistent behaviour with annotate using concat and
GenericIPAddressField
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Lorenzo Morandini | Owner: nobody
Type: Bug | Status: closed
Component: Database layer | Version: 4.2
(models, ORM) |
Severity: Normal | Resolution: needsinfo
Keywords: | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Sarah Boyce):
* resolution: => needsinfo
* status: new => closed
Comment:
Hi Lorenzo, thank you for this report.
I am struggling to replicate this locally and need a few more details. To
help me, please provide:
- what database are you using
- what version of Python are you using
- did you upgrade Python when upgrading from Django 3.2 to 4.2
We use
[https://docs.python.org/3/library/ipaddress.html#ipaddress.IPv4Network
ipaddress] from the Python standard library and `/32` is documented as a
default mask for `IPv4Network`, hence the version of Python might be
important here and whether this changed while upgrading.
If you want to make my day, you could
[https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/internals/contributing/writing-code
/unit-tests/#unit-tests write a regression test] which will help verify
the issue and make sure it gets resolved quickly.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35348#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018e9e6ffe76-773515e0-cd5e-42d9-90fa-2f922dda2e1a-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
