#8307: ImageFile use of width_field and height_field is slow with remote storage
     Reporter:  sebastian.serrano@…  |                    Owner:  Jacob
         Type:                       |                   Status:  new
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  File                 |                  Version:  dev
  uploads/storage                    |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  imagefile height     |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
  width                              |
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
Comment (by john-parton):

 I've created a different pull request with a different approach, which is
 better than my other patch in at least two ways:

 * It removes an extra container class I was using as a signal for when to
 * It removes an extra keyword argument I had to add (returning the
 function signature to as it was before the patch)


 I think we need to come to consensus on whether this is a bug that we can
 just patch, or if this change is significant enough that we need to
 introduce a setting to opt-in to the behavior (most likely changing the
 setting in a future release).
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8307#comment:22>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to