#8307: ImageFile use of width_field and height_field is slow with remote storage
backends
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: sebastian.serrano@… | Owner: Jacob
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: File | Version: dev
uploads/storage |
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: imagefile height | Triage Stage: Accepted
width |
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by john-parton):
I've created a different pull request with a different approach, which is
better than my other patch in at least two ways:
* It removes an extra container class I was using as a signal for when to
update
* It removes an extra keyword argument I had to add (returning the
function signature to as it was before the patch)
https://github.com/django/django/pull/18070
I think we need to come to consensus on whether this is a bug that we can
just patch, or if this change is significant enough that we need to
introduce a setting to opt-in to the behavior (most likely changing the
setting in a future release).
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8307#comment:22>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018ee23b048d-48ad42d3-629e-479f-bc0e-1ecc520e56a0-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
