#7442: docs about decoupling urls doesn't decouple all the way
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
          Reporter:  siva_          |         Owner:  nobody
            Status:  closed         |     Milestone:        
         Component:  Documentation  |       Version:  SVN   
        Resolution:  wontfix        |      Keywords:        
             Stage:  Unreviewed     |     Has_patch:  0     
        Needs_docs:  0              |   Needs_tests:  0     
Needs_better_patch:  0              |  
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by newbie):

 At the risk of arguing endlessly, I respectfully agree with my fellow
 Django initiate.  If I understand the significance of apps and projects
 properly, this is not only not decoupled, but it is doubly coupled.  If
 the maintainer of a project has to modify project-level settings to
 include someone else's application, that's understood, although the fewer
 modifications necessary, the better.  If the maintainer of a project has
 to modify both the project and the application, that's not so desirable.

 Is there some way that patterns() can be made to reference the invoking
 module without having to identify it by name?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7442#comment:3>
Django Code <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to