#35712: CheckConstraint with RawSQL breaks ModelForm when inside
transaction.atomic()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  a-p-f                |                    Owner:  (none)
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  5.1
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Simon Charette):

 * component:  Uncategorized => Database layer (models, ORM)
 * stage:  Unreviewed => Accepted

Comment:

 Accepting on the basis that performing the validation, or not, should not
 leave the database in a unusable state. A potential patch could be

 {{{#!diff
 diff --git a/django/db/models/query_utils.py
 b/django/db/models/query_utils.py
 index 1bf396723e..1b41314bc7 100644
 --- a/django/db/models/query_utils.py
 +++ b/django/db/models/query_utils.py
 @@ -10,9 +10,10 @@
  import inspect
  import logging
  from collections import namedtuple
 +from contextlib import nullcontext

  from django.core.exceptions import FieldError
 -from django.db import DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS, DatabaseError, connections
 +from django.db import DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS, DatabaseError, connections,
 transaction
  from django.db.models.constants import LOOKUP_SEP
  from django.utils import tree
  from django.utils.functional import cached_property
 @@ -131,13 +132,20 @@ def check(self, against, using=DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS):
              query.add_annotation(value, name, select=False)
          query.add_annotation(Value(1), "_check")
          # This will raise a FieldError if a field is missing in
 "against".
 -        if connections[using].features.supports_comparing_boolean_expr:
 +        connection = connections[using]
 +        if connection.features.supports_comparing_boolean_expr:
              query.add_q(Q(Coalesce(self, True,
 output_field=BooleanField())))
          else:
              query.add_q(self)
          compiler = query.get_compiler(using=using)
 +        context_manager = (
 +            transaction.atomic(using=using)
 +            if connection.in_atomic_block
 +            else nullcontext()
 +        )
          try:
 -            return compiler.execute_sql(SINGLE) is not None
 +            with context_manager:
 +                return compiler.execute_sql(SINGLE) is not None
          except DatabaseError as e:
              logger.warning("Got a database error calling check() on %r:
 %s", self, e)
              return True
 }}}

 If you're interested in submitting a PR it looks like
 `test_q.QCheckTests.test_rawsql` could be adjusted to confirm that the
 connection is still usable after database error.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35712#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019194f853a6-8e7edb72-ac79-48c0-aa37-bd6e3923c12c-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to