#36207: refresh_from_db() doesn't refresh ForeignObject relations
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Jacob Walls | Owner: Gregory
| Mariani
Type: Bug | Status: assigned
Component: Database layer | Version: 5.2
(models, ORM) |
Severity: Release blocker | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Jacob Walls):
> Because comment.user = None will set the value None
But the test case I sketched doesn't save that change to the database, so
my expectation was that `refresh_from_db()` would return the same thing
that a fresh query would return. Or at least this was my expectation based
on how `ForeignKey` works.
> So if we set user_id to None, the relations are destroyed for a
ForeignObject.
If this is how ForeignObject is supposed to work, then I feel we need to
document it, because from the composite PK guide that I linked it's not
obvious. However my impression is that it's ''not'' supposed to work like
`.add()`, which immediately alters data.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/36207#comment:9>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/01070195342ac241-89dae5d3-b69b-46db-b035-44e20fd67864-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.