#36416: id_list argument to in_bulk() does not account for composite primary
keys
when batching
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Jacob Walls | Owner: Jacob
| Walls
Type: Bug | Status: assigned
Component: Database layer | Version: 5.2
(models, ORM) |
Severity: Release blocker | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Natalia Bidart):
* cc: Csirmaz Bendegúz (added)
* stage: Unreviewed => Accepted
Comment:
Replying to [comment:4 Jacob Walls]:
> I left a
[https://github.com/django/django/pull/19502#discussion_r2105896691 note]
here that I believe the slowness is simply due to the unfixed #36380 (and
I added mocking in order to avoid creating such a large batch either way).
The draft test finishes for me when I apply the fix for #36380 -- sorry I
didn't pull these pieces together into the ticket description.
Thank you, I missed this. When running the given test with the fixes for
#36380, I also get the `django.db.utils.OperationalError: too many SQL
variables`.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/36416#comment:6>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/010701970e6deb16-ac80d3e0-c336-4879-8496-23c99c8d7b98-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
