#37065: @method_decorator can't be used on async view at class-level with
name="dispatch"
-----------------------------+--------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Jacob Walls  |                    Owner:  Vishy Algo
         Type:  Bug          |                   Status:  assigned
    Component:  Utilities    |                  Version:  5.2
     Severity:  Normal       |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  async        |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  1            |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0            |  Patch needs improvement:  1
Easy pickings:  0            |                    UI/UX:  0
-----------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment (by Carlton Gibson):

 This is a doozy. I'm not convinced it's tractable... (at reasonable
 cost/complexity to method_decorator).

 If the method being decorated is not async then it's not 100% clear to me
 that method_decorator should do **any** further introspection to determine
 if the return value should be marked as a coroutine.

 We're asking it to decorate a method, and #35083 was about allowing those
 methods to be async. Both conjuncts work.

 > Moving the decorator to the method instead of the class works.

 A further ''know significant details about the particulars of View''
 strikes me as out of scope for method_decorator.

 If I **had to** decorate `dispatch` for an async view class, I think this
 is probably the best option:


 {{{
     @method_decorator(never_cache, name="dispatch")
     class MyClass(View):
         async def dispatch(self, *args, **kwargs):
             return super().dispatch(*args, **kwargs)

         async def get(self, request):
              return HttpResponse()
 }}}

 (Not tested. You get the idea)

 This somewhat mitigates using the `name="dispatch"` — so I'd probably put
 it on the method directly, and I'd only need to do ''that'' if we also had
 say `async def post` as well.

 But I think trying to automagically our way forward here is mistake. It's
 complex. It just is.

 So I think a docs tweak is probably the way to go.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/37065#comment:7>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019e2c80a9d0-07e16fe2-8229-471e-b528-06ff39a9bb81-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to