#8576: Multiple AutoFields in a model
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  honeyman          |       Owner:  nobody    
   Status:  new               |   Milestone:            
Component:  Database wrapper  |     Version:  SVN       
 Keywords:                    |       Stage:  Unreviewed
Has_patch:  1                 |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 Got the assertions failed recently:

   File "C:\Projects\houserules\www\hrdb\events\hrpercustomerobject.py",
 line 14, in <module>
     class HRPerCustomerObject(models.Model):
   File "C:\Projects\houserules\www\hrdb\events\hrpercustomerobject.py",
 line 37, in HRPerCustomerObject
     id_percustomer = models.AutoField ( 'Per-customer ID' )
   File "C:\Projects\houserules\www\django\db\models\fields\__init__.py",
 line 425, in __init__
     assert kwargs.get('primary_key', False) is True, "%ss must have
 primary_key=True." % self.__class__.__name__
 AssertionError: AutoFields must have primary_key=True.
 make: *** [_reset] Error 1

 and

   File "C:\Projects\houserules\www\django\db\models\options.py", line 117,
 in _prepare
     model.add_to_class('id', auto)
   File "C:\Projects\houserules\www\django\db\models\base.py", line 139, in
 add_to_class
     value.contribute_to_class(cls, name)
   File "C:\Projects\houserules\www\django\db\models\fields\__init__.py",
 line 459, in contribute_to_class
     assert not cls._meta.has_auto_field, "A model can't have more than one
 AutoField."
 AssertionError: A model can't have more than one AutoField.
 make: *** [_reset] Error 1

 Depending on the logic and the scenario, it may be really worthy to have
 several AutoFields in a model (for example, when one or both of them in
 some cases is controlled manually), one of which will definitely not be a
 primary key.
 I roughly described one of possible scenarios in
 [http://oebfare.com/logger/django/2008/08/26/ IRC], though this may be not
 the only one.
 Please note that the databases itself do not imply such behaviour
 (auto_increment field in MySQL does not imply a primary key, neither
 SERIAL field in PostgreSQL does), so it is unsafe and overrestrictive to
 add such a limitation in Django.
 The existing documentation on AutoField also does not imply it should be
 used for primary keys only.

 My proposal is to withdraw such a limitation; seems that it is only
 required to remove two assert lines from the code�(well, and the related
 tests, of course).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8576>
Django Code <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to