#9239: Better reverse() handling for the (.*) pattern
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: mtredinnick | Owner: mtredinnick
Status: closed | Milestone:
Component: Core framework | Version: 1.0
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords:
Stage: Unreviewed | Has_patch: 0
Needs_docs: 0 | Needs_tests: 0
Needs_better_patch: 0 |
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Changes (by mtredinnick):
* status: new => closed
* needs_better_patch: => 0
* resolution: => wontfix
* needs_tests: => 0
* needs_docs: => 0
Comment:
Now that I look at the code, this would be unnecessarily fiddly to handle.
We currently can completely ignore the contents of capturing groups and
having to process them just for a few special cases would be extra work
for no huge benefit.
Turns out that `(.*)?` would work as a pattern if somebody didn't want to
have to pass in empty arguments. So wontfix-ing my own ticket, upon
reflection.
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9239#comment:1>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
