#9602: Add admin.site._registry manipulation methods ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Reporter: robhudson | Owner: nobody Status: new | Milestone: Component: django.contrib.admin | Version: 1.0 Keywords: register modeladmin | Stage: Unreviewed Has_patch: 0 | ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- This is a feature request...
Currently, one can unregister a model from the admin and register it again with a new ModelAdmin. The problem I'm anticipating is when 2 or more apps want to add ModelAdmin options to a Model and the last one wins. Not to point out a specific 3rd party app, but this is an easily contrived example... If I have my own apps and one of them unregisters the User model's ModelAdmin and registers its own that, say, adds the `is_superuser` to the list_display. Then if I add the django-openid app that (currently) also unregisters the User model's ModelAdmin and registers its own that adds an inline to a ManyToManyField for the OpenID associations tied to that user. If django-openid is after my app in the INSTALLED_APPS list, I lose my list_display override. And if my app is after the django-openid app, I lose the OpenID associations inlines. (See: http://code.google.com/p/django- openid/source/browse/trunk/django_openid/admin.py) It's possible currently to write the unregistration/registration such that this doesn't happen, but it relies on pulling the ModelAdmin out of the "private" _registry dictionary in the admin.site class. For example: {{{ useradmin = admin.site._registry.get(User, None) if useradmin: useradmin.list_display = useradmin.list_display + ('is_superuser',) else: class MyUserAdmin(AuthUserAdmin): list_display = ('username', 'email', 'first_name', 'last_name', 'is_staff', 'is_superuser') admin.site.register(User, MyUserAdmin) }}} I can think of a few ways of fixing this, from least involved to more involved: 1. At the very least I think it would be nice if the internal `_registry` dictionary didn't have the prepended underscore to signify that it is a private variable not to be touched, so one doesn't feel dirty doing something like this. 2. I think it would be a bit cleaner if there were methods to lookup, get, and update this dict and keep it as a private dict. For example, something like `admin.site.get_model_admin(User)`? 3. Along with 2, provide methods to update common ModelAdmin options, like `list_display`. This one is definitely venturing into debatable area, but something like `useradmin.list_display.add('is_superuser')` takes much away from this feeling so "monkey patchy". -- Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9602> Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
