#7609: PositiveIntegerField and co have a misleading name
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+--
Reporter: Gergely Kontra <[email protected]> |
Owner: programmerq
Status: assigned |
Milestone:
Component: Forms |
Version: SVN
Resolution: |
Keywords: name convention, rename
Stage: Design decision needed |
Has_patch: 0
Needs_docs: 0 |
Needs_tests: 0
Needs_better_patch: 0 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+--
Comment (by kmtracey):
#10719 marked as a dup. I favor its recommendation to explicitly note in
the docs these fields include zero as valid input. I don't think we need
yet more names for the same thing and it would be backwards-incompatible
at this point to start disallowing zero for these fields.
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7609#comment:5>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
