#13: Related objects interface should be tighter (edit_inline)
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: adrian | Owner: barbuza
Status: reopened | Milestone:
Component: django.contrib.admin | Version: SVN
Resolution: | Keywords: nfa-someday
nfa-changelist
Stage: Accepted | Has_patch: 0
Needs_docs: 0 | Needs_tests: 0
Needs_better_patch: 1 |
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by anonymous):
"That's the way it seems to me too. But I believe there is a whole
discussion on using too much Javascript in the standard shipment of
Django. It seems to me that this would be better suited for distribution
as a separate application. "
Well obviously django doesnt want to favor any js lib but on the other
hand it would be rather stupid to reinvent the wheel. I guess this is why
this issue is still open. Obiviously this is a bad circle. We want nice js
and ajax bells and whistles but we dont want to favor any js lib (even if
jquery is the best ;) the result? the admin will remain rigid. third party
admins like http://code.google.com/p/sorl-curator/ will take over.
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13#comment:76>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
