#9150: Generic views should accept arguements for form_class
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
          Reporter:  erikcw                  |         Owner:  toabctl          
                   
            Status:  assigned                |     Milestone:                   
                   
         Component:  Generic views           |       Version:  1.0              
                   
        Resolution:                          |      Keywords:  generic views, 
form_class, arguments
             Stage:  Design decision needed  |     Has_patch:  1                
                   
        Needs_docs:  1                       |   Needs_tests:  1                
                   
Needs_better_patch:  1                       |  
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by toabctl):

 Replying to [comment:6 kmtracey]:
 > Only absolutely critical bugs go into 1.1 at this point.  This is a
 feature/new function -- and it still in design decision needed, not
 accepted, stage -- so 1.1 is not an appropriate milestone.

 ok. i understand this point. but the ticket is 10 month old. when will be
 a design decision?

 >
 > Also, the patch should be generated from the root of the source tree,
 and is currently lacking both documentation and tests.  Please read:
 >
 > http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/contributing/#patch-style

 the new patch fix this problem. i also added some documentation

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9150#comment:7>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to