#11486: There are no way to provide empty (or null/None) "pk" for XML serialized
object to deserialized
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
          Reporter:  zdmytriv       |         Owner:  nobody              
            Status:  new            |     Milestone:  1.0.3               
         Component:  Serialization  |       Version:  1.0                 
        Resolution:                 |      Keywords:  xml, deserialization
             Stage:  Accepted       |     Has_patch:  0                   
        Needs_docs:  0              |   Needs_tests:  1                   
Needs_better_patch:  1              |  
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Changes (by russellm):

  * needs_better_patch:  0 => 1
  * needs_tests:  0 => 1
  * stage:  Unreviewed => Accepted

Comment:

 This is an interesting omission from the XML serializer. However, your
 proposed solution won't work - what happens when you have an object with a
 string primary key and you want to use a primary key value of "None"?
 Using this approach, there is no difference between pk=None and pk="None".

 In this case, I suspect the right approach is to change the parser so that
 the pk attribute isn't mandatory, and then interpret the absence of the pk
 attribute as a null PK value.

 From a procedural point of view, any patch would also require tests before
 it would be accepted for trunk.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11486#comment:2>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to