#12339: ContentType update could cascade deletes to generic foreign keys,
causing
data loss
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: kcarnold | Owner: nobody
Status: reopened | Milestone:
Component: Contrib apps | Version: 1.1
Resolution: | Keywords: contenttype, delete,
cascade
Stage: Unreviewed | Has_patch: 0
Needs_docs: 0 | Needs_tests: 0
Needs_better_patch: 0 |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment (by kcarnold):
Pick your patch.
The first one just removes the dangerous {{{delete}}}, always leaving
stale content types alone.
The second one keeps the {{{delete}}}, but guards it by a flag that
defaults to False. It documents how to call the command with that flag
being true. (It also incidentally enables {{{update_all_contenttypes}}} to
pass along the new {{{db}}} parameter. I don't know if that's useful,
though.) That documentation might arguably belong in the main docs, but I
don't think it's worth integrating, given that it merely patches over the
real problem (lack of migration support).
I care that this bug is fixed, but I'm indifferent to which approach you
prefer to take.
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12339#comment:6>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.