#13772: 'exists' parameter for pre_save signal
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: gsakkis | Owner: nobody
Status: reopened | Milestone: 1.3
Component: Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: 1.2
Resolution: | Keywords:
Stage: Design decision needed | Has_patch: 1
Needs_docs: 1 | Needs_tests: 0
Needs_better_patch: 0 |
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Changes (by lrekucki):
* stage: Ready for checkin => Design decision needed
Comment:
This ticket's history is a mess right now. You shouldn't mark your own
patches as RFC. For starters, it still needs documentation. After that,
they need to be reviewed by someone else.
Also, based on [http://groups.google.com/group/django-
developers/browse_frm/thread/3b5939ba089bce51/67892d99a9a6aff3 comment
from Jeremy Dunck on django-dev], I'm not so sure we can just do this
without cost. I'm going to push this back to DDN.
--
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13772#comment:8>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-upda...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.
