#14074: RFE: "Best of both worlds" for short and long?
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
          Reporter:  JonathanHayward  |         Owner:  nobody
            Status:  closed           |     Milestone:        
         Component:  Documentation    |       Version:  1.2   
        Resolution:  wontfix          |      Keywords:        
             Stage:  Unreviewed       |     Has_patch:  0     
        Needs_docs:  0                |   Needs_tests:  0     
Needs_better_patch:  0                |  
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by gabrielhurley):

  * status:  new => closed
  * needs_better_patch:  => 0
  * resolution:  => wontfix
  * needs_tests:  => 0
  * needs_docs:  => 0

Comment:

 While giving people the "short and sweet" version is always nice, there's
 very little consensus on what "short and sweet" ever really needs to
 cover. It's a very subjective topic.

 Django's docs are divided up into sections to some degree along those
 types of lines already... there are sections for introduction, how-to, in-
 depth topic guides, and thorough reference pages.

 So, in short, this issue is too broad to ever really be completed. If you
 feel there are specific pages in the docs that lack a proper introduction,
 feel free to open tickets for them individually with suggestions (or
 patches) for what ought to be contained in them.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14074#comment:1>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Reply via email to