#14056: Wrong query generated when using reverse foreign key
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
          Reporter:  premalshah                    |         Owner:  nobody     
                
            Status:  new                           |     Milestone:  1.3        
                
         Component:  Database layer (models, ORM)  |       Version:  SVN        
                
        Resolution:                                |      Keywords:  foreign 
key, reverse lookup
             Stage:  Accepted                      |     Has_patch:  1          
                
        Needs_docs:  0                             |   Needs_tests:  0          
                
Needs_better_patch:  0                             |  
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Changes (by accuser):

  * keywords:  foreign key => foreign key, reverse lookup
  * has_patch:  0 => 1
  * version:  1.0 => SVN

Comment:

 Got an idea, that trim optimization of the join, which has been got by the
 simple reverse relation, -- is incorrect, because first "real table"
 doesn't contain any relation to second one, so it can't get sought-for
 field value.

 Will attach possible straight-forward solution with tests in the next
 comment.

 I'm not sure of this ticket is related to #11319. It seems that `to_field`
 attribute is partially broken.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14056#comment:10>
Django <http://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.

Reply via email to