#18297: Reverse generic relation to a model inheriting from the model defining a
generic relation confuses flush
-------------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: pronik | Owner: nobody
Type: Bug | Status: new
Component: Uncategorized | Version: 1.3
Severity: Normal | Keywords:
Triage Stage: Unreviewed | Has patch: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------+--------------------
Please look into attached file, I've created a minimal test project for
this bug. You'll have to include your database credentials in
`settings.py` before you try it.
Let's say we have model with a generic relation (e.g.
`django.contrib.comments.models.Comment`) and a model deriving from it
(e.g. `OtherComment`). Now, if a reverse generic relation to
`OtherComment` is defined, it would correctly work and point to a list of
`OtherComment` instances. However, `flush` would now try to reset the
sequence on `id` field of `OtherComment` which does not exist
(`OtherComment` only has `comment_ptr_id`) while resetting `id` on
`Comment` would be correct.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18297>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.
