#18621: Two ManyToMany fields without backwards relation
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: anonymous | Owner: anonymous
Type: | Status: assigned
Cleanup/optimization | Version: 1.4
Component: Documentation | Resolution:
Severity: Normal | Triage Stage: Accepted
Keywords: backwards relation | Needs documentation: 0
model | Patch needs improvement: 0
Has patch: 0 | UI/UX: 0
Needs tests: 0 |
Easy pickings: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by aaugustin):
* component: Database layer (models, ORM) => Documentation
* type: Bug => Cleanup/optimization
* stage: Unreviewed => Accepted
Comment:
Set `related_name='foo+'` on one field and `related_name='bar+'` on the
other. It will work.
The documentation could explain that.
----
That said, Frank's comment isn't wrong:
> I would ask why you're bothered by having the backwards relation, just
don't use it if you don't want it.
[[BR]]
To be honest, I'm not sure why this feature exists!
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18621#comment:3>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-updates?hl=en.
