#18153: Erorneous OneToOneField for instances that have pk unset -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: jbzdak@… | Owner: dhatch Type: Bug | Status: assigned Component: Database layer | Version: 1.4 (models, ORM) | Resolution: Severity: Normal | Triage Stage: Accepted Keywords: | Needs documentation: 0 Has patch: 1 | Patch needs improvement: 0 Needs tests: 0 | UI/UX: 0 Easy pickings: 0 | -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by aaugustin): (1) I agree with Andrew that !SingleRelatedObjectDescriptor should return an error in this case, and it's what I've implemented in the patch I attached to #19089. (2) The asymmetry between forwards relations and backwards relations exists on purpose. The underlying relation in the database is asymmetric. So, at first sight, I disagree with the `and not self.related.field.null` part. I'm willing to reconsider (2), which is tracked in #10227. We can continue that part of the discussion over there. But I think we can fix (1), which is an obvious bug, without waiting for the decision on (2). Since I independently wrote the same patch as dhatch, it's probably a reasonable solution. I plan combine both patches — mine doesn't break on legit values of `pk` such as `''` or `0`, dhaty's has more tests — and commit the result soon. -- Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18153#comment:11> Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/> The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django updates" group. To post to this group, send email to django-updates@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-updates+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.