django-updates
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [Django] #34991: Wrong layout of pagination buttons with editable list in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #34991: Wrong layout of pagination buttons with editable list in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #34991: Wrong layout of pagination buttons with editable list in the admin. (was: Small admin panel css bug in pagination styles)
Django
[Django] #34991: Small admin panel css bug in pagination styles
Django
Re: [Django] #34991: Small admin panel css bug in pagination styles
Django
Re: [Django] #34991: Small admin panel css bug in pagination styles
Django
Re: [Django] #34990: Change external link for CSRF reference docs to OWASP
Django
Re: [Django] #34990: Change external link for CSRF reference docs to OWASP
Django
Re: [Django] #34990: Change external link for CSRF reference docs to OWASP
Django
Re: [Django] #34990: Change external link for CSRF reference docs to OWASP
Django
Re: [Django] #34990: Change external link for CSRF reference docs to OWASP
Django
Re: [Django] #26827: "ModelState.fields cannot refer to a model class ... Use a string reference instead." when using custom model field derived from ManyToMany
Django
Re: [Django] #26827: "ModelState.fields cannot refer to a model class ... Use a string reference instead." when using custom model field derived from ManyToMany
Django
Re: [Django] #26827: "ModelState.fields cannot refer to a model class ... Use a string reference instead." when using custom model field derived from ManyToMany
Django
Re: [Django] #26827: "ModelState.fields cannot refer to a model class ... Use a string reference instead." when using custom model field derived from ManyToMany
Django
Re: [Django] #26827: "ModelState.fields cannot refer to a model class ... Use a string reference instead." when using custom model field derived from ManyToMany
Django
Re: [Django] #33700: APPEND_SLASH adds significant latency to all requests not ending in / (even if successful)
Django
[Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #34989: APPEND_SLASH redirects much slower in Django 4.2 when used with uWSGI's http11-socket
Django
Re: [Django] #28919: Add support for Common Table Expression (CTE) queries
Django
Re: [Django] #28919: Add support for Common Table Expression (CTE) queries
Django
[Django] #34988: Makemigrations shouldn't prompt for default values for non-nullable fields of other apps.
Django
Re: [Django] #34988: Makemigrations shouldn't prompt for default values for non-nullable fields of other apps.
Django
Re: [Django] #34988: Makemigrations shouldn't prompt for default values for non-nullable fields of other apps.
Django
Re: [Django] #34988: Makemigrations shouldn't prompt for default values for non-nullable fields of other apps.
Django
Re: [Django] #34988: Makemigrations shouldn't prompt for default values for non-nullable fields of other apps.
Django
Re: [Django] #34988: Makemigrations shouldn't prompt for default values for non-nullable fields of other apps.
Django
Re: [Django] #34988: Makemigrations shouldn't prompt for default values for non-nullable fields of other apps.
Django
Re: [Django] #34985: Migrations raise AppRegistryNotReady when GeneratedField references incorrect fields.
Django
Re: [Django] #34985: Migrations raise AppRegistryNotReady when GeneratedField references incorrect fields.
Django
Re: [Django] #34985: Migrations raise AppRegistryNotReady when GeneratedField references incorrect fields.
Django
Re: [Django] #34985: Migrations raise AppRegistryNotReady when GeneratedField references incorrect fields.
Django
Re: [Django] #34985: Migrations raise AppRegistryNotReady when GeneratedField references incorrect fields.
Django
Re: [Django] #34985: Migrations raise AppRegistryNotReady when GeneratedField references incorrect fields.
Django
Re: [Django] #34985: Migrations raise AppRegistryNotReady when GeneratedField references incorrect fields.
Django
Re: [Django] #34985: Migrations raise AppRegistryNotReady when GeneratedField references incorrect fields. (was: Confusing migration failures in GeneratedField)
Django
[Django] #34987: "Expression contains mixed types" exception when performing window function on query that also has aggregates.
Django
Re: [Django] #34987: "Expression contains mixed types" exception when performing window function on query that also has aggregates.
Django
Re: [Django] #34987: "Expression contains mixed types" exception when performing window function on query that also has aggregates.
Django
Re: [Django] #34987: "Expression contains mixed types" exception when performing window function on query that also has aggregates.
Django
Re: [Django] #34987: "Expression contains mixed types" exception when performing window function on query that also has aggregates.
Django
Re: [Django] #34987: "Expression contains mixed types" exception when performing window function on query that also has aggregates.
Django
Re: [Django] #34987: "Expression contains mixed types" exception when performing window function on query that also has aggregates.
Django
Re: [Django] #34987: "Expression contains mixed types" exception when performing window function on query that also has aggregates.
Django
[Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
Re: [Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
Re: [Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
Re: [Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
Re: [Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
Re: [Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
Re: [Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
Re: [Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
Re: [Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
Re: [Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
Re: [Django] #34986: Fix up support for PyPy 3.10
Django
[Django] #34985: Confusing migration failures in GeneratedField
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: Adding a field with default crashes for models with GeneratedField on SQLite.
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: Adding a field with default crashes for models with GeneratedField on SQLite.
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: Adding a field with default crashes for models with GeneratedField on SQLite.
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: Adding a field with default crashes for models with GeneratedField on SQLite.
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: Adding a field with default crashes for models with GeneratedField on SQLite.
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: Adding a field with default crashes for models with GeneratedField on SQLite.
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: Adding a field with default crashes for models with GeneratedField on SQLite.
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: Adding a field with default crashes for models with GeneratedField on SQLite.
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: Adding a field with default crashes for models with GeneratedField on SQLite. (was: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite))
Django
[Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
Re: [Django] #34984: One-off default migrations fail on tables with GeneratedField (on SQLite)
Django
[Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
Re: [Django] #34983: Deprecate django.utils.itercompat.is_iterable().
Django
[Django] #34982: Visual regression for helptext with RTL languages.
Django
Re: [Django] #34982: Visual regression for helptext with RTL languages.
Django
Re: [Django] #34982: Visual regression for helptext with RTL languages.
Django
Re: [Django] #34982: Visual regression for helptext with RTL languages.
Django
Re: [Django] #34982: Visual regression for helptext with RTL languages.
Django
Re: [Django] #34982: Visual regression for helptext with RTL languages.
Django
Re: [Django] #34982: Visual regression for helptext with RTL languages.
Django
Re: [Django] #34982: Visual regression for helptext with RTL languages.
Django
Re: [Django] #34982: Visual regression for helptext with RTL languages.
Django
[Django] #34981: Promote `--pair` and `--bisect` from `runtest.py` to be available as flags for the Django `test` command
Django
Re: [Django] #34981: Promote `--pair` and `--bisect` from `runtest.py` to be available as flags for the Django `test` command
Django
Re: [Django] #34981: Promote `--pair` and `--bisect` from `runtest.py` to be available as flags for the Django `test` command
Django
Re: [Django] #34981: Promote `--pair` and `--bisect` from `runtest.py` to be available as flags for the Django `test` command
Django
Re: [Django] #34981: Promote `--pair` and `--bisect` from `runtest.py` to be available as flags for the Django `test` command
Django
Re: [Django] #34981: Promote `--pair` and `--bisect` from `runtest.py` to be available as flags for the Django `test` command
Django
Re: [Django] #14810: Admin inline templates need blocks
Django
Re: [Django] #34980: Change migration operation dependencies to namedtuples.
Django
Re: [Django] #34980: Change migration operation dependencies to namedtuples.
Django
Re: [Django] #34980: Change migration operation dependencies to namedtuples. (was: Changed migration operation dependencies to namedtuples.)
Django
[Django] #34980: Changed migration operation dependencies to namedtuples.
Django
Re: [Django] #34980: Changed migration operation dependencies to namedtuples.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB.
Django
Re: [Django] #31026: Switch form rendering to template engine
Django
Re: [Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with RawSQL() raises 1056 "Can't group on" on MySQL/MariaDB. (was: Annotating through an aggregate with MySQL/MariaDB raises 1056 "Can't group on" error)
Django
Re: [Django] #34976: startproject and startapp should provide feedback
Django
Re: [Django] #34976: startproject and startapp should provide feedback
Django
[Django] #34979: inlineformset_factory sets max_num forms to one even though there is a unique_together constraint
Django
Re: [Django] #34979: inlineformset_factory sets max_num forms to one even though there is a unique_together constraint
Django
Re: [Django] #34979: inlineformset_factory sets max_num forms to one even though there is a unique_together constraint
Django
Re: [Django] #34979: inlineformset_factory sets max_num forms to one even though there is a unique_together constraint
Django
Re: [Django] #34979: inlineformset_factory sets max_num forms to one even though there is a unique_together constraint
Django
[Django] #34978: Annotating through an aggregate with MySQL/MariaDB raises 1056 "Can't group on" error
Django
[Django] #34977: Turn link to change password form in admin user change form into a button
Django
Re: [Django] #34977: Turn link to change password form in admin user change form into a button
Django
Re: [Django] #34977: Turn link to change password form in admin user change form into a button
Django
Re: [Django] #34977: Turn link to change password form in admin user change form into a button
Django
Re: [Django] #34977: Turn link to change password form in admin user change form into a button
Django
Re: [Django] #34977: Turn link to change password form in admin user change form into a button
Django
Re: [Django] #34977: Turn link to change password form in admin user change form into a button
Django
Re: [Django] #34977: Turn link to change password form in admin user change form into a button
Django
Re: [Django] #34977: Turn link to change password form in admin user change form into a button
Django
Re: [Django] #34976: startproject and startapp should provide feedback (was: Feature request: startproject and startapp should provide feedback)
Django
[Django] #34976: Feature request: startproject and startapp should provide feedback
Django
Re: [Django] #34976: Feature request: startproject and startapp should provide feedback
Django
Re: [Django] #25307: Cannot use .annotate with conditional expressions
Django
Re: [Django] #25307: Cannot use .annotate with conditional expressions
Django
Re: [Django] #25307: Cannot use .annotate with conditional expressions
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: aggregate() crashes when referencing existing aggregations or window expressions through conditional expressions
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: aggregate() crashes when referencing existing aggregations or window expressions through conditional expressions
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: aggregate() crashes when referencing existing aggregations or window expressions through conditional expressions
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: aggregate() crashes when referencing existing aggregations or window expressions through conditional expressions
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: aggregate() crashes when referencing existing aggregations or window expressions through conditional expressions
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: aggregate() crashes when referencing existing aggregations or window expressions through conditional expressions
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: aggregate() crashes when referencing existing aggregations or window expressions through conditional expressions
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: aggregate() crashes when referencing existing aggregations or window expressions through conditional expressions (was: Getting refs does not work properly with models.Window and aggregation)
Django
Re: [Django] #33166: Add "field" to the context when rendering widgets.
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: Getting refs does not work properly with models.Window and aggregation
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: Getting refs does not work properly with models.Window and aggregation
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: Getting refs does not work properly with models.Window and aggregation
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: Getting refs does not work properly with models.Window and aggregation
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: Getting refs does not work properly with models.Window and aggregation
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: Getting refs does not work properly with models.Window and aggregation
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: Getting refs does not work properly with models.Window and aggregation
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: Getting refs does not work properly with models.Window and aggregation (was: Getting refs is not work properly with models.Window and aggregation)
Django
[Django] #34975: Getting refs is not work properly with models.Window and aggregation
Django
Re: [Django] #34975: Getting refs is not work properly with models.Window and aggregation
Django
[Django] #34974: makemigrations --check does not show diff as documented
Django
Re: [Django] #34974: makemigrations --check does not show diff as documented
Django
Re: [Django] #34974: makemigrations --check does not show diff as documented
Django
Re: [Django] #34974: makemigrations --check does not show diff as documented
Django
Re: [Django] #34974: makemigrations --check does not show diff as documented
Django
Re: [Django] #34974: makemigrations --check does not show diff as documented
Django
[Django] #34973: Allow making unpickling warnings an error
Django
Re: [Django] #34973: Allow making unpickling warnings an error
Django
[Django] #34972: Aggregate with CombinedExpression resulting in NotImplemented instead of None after update from 3.2 -> 4.2
Django
Re: [Django] #34972: Aggregate with CombinedExpression resulting in NotImplemented instead of None after update from 3.2 -> 4.2
Django
Re: [Django] #34972: Aggregate with CombinedExpression resulting in NotImplemented instead of None after update from 3.2 -> 4.2
Django
Re: [Django] #34972: Aggregate with CombinedExpression resulting in NotImplemented instead of None after update from 3.2 -> 4.2
Django
Re: [Django] #34972: Aggregate with CombinedExpression resulting in NotImplemented instead of None after update from 3.2 -> 4.2
Django
Re: [Django] #16281: ContentType.get_object_for_this_type using wrong database for creating object
Django
Re: [Django] #16281: ContentType.get_object_for_this_type using wrong database for creating object
Django
Re: [Django] #16281: ContentType.get_object_for_this_type using wrong database for creating object
Django
Re: [Django] #34971: Several loggers missing from logging documentation
Django
[Django] #34971: Several loggers missing from logging documentation
Django
Re: [Django] #34971: Several loggers missing from logging documentation
Django
Re: [Django] #34971: Several loggers missing from logging documentation
Django
Earlier messages
Later messages