django-updates
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
Re: [Django] #29177: Unmanaged models with ForeignKeys do not get those fields serialized into their migration state when CreateModel happens.
Django
[Django] #36373: select_related() doesn't work when targeting composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36373: select_related() doesn't work when targeting composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36373: select_related() doesn't work when targeting composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36373: select_related() doesn't work when targeting composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36373: select_related() doesn't work when targeting composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36373: select_related() doesn't work when targeting composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36373: select_related() doesn't work when targeting composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36373: select_related() doesn't work when targeting composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36373: select_related() doesn't work when targeting composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36373: select_related() doesn't work when targeting composite primary keys
Django
[Django] #36372: refresh_from_db with explicit fields can't clear a relation unless it's prefetched
Django
Re: [Django] #36372: refresh_from_db with explicit fields can't clear a relation unless it's prefetched
Django
Re: [Django] #36372: refresh_from_db with explicit fields can't clear a relation unless it's prefetched
Django
Re: [Django] #36372: refresh_from_db with explicit fields can't clear a relation unless it's prefetched
Django
Re: [Django] #26940: makemessages incorrectly configured as not requiring settings
Django
Re: [Django] #26940: makemessages incorrectly configured as not requiring settings
Django
Re: [Django] #33312: Instances with deferred fields cannot be used for copying.
Django
Re: [Django] #33312: Instances with deferred fields cannot be used for copying.
Django
Re: [Django] #33312: Instances with deferred fields cannot be used for copying.
Django
Re: [Django] #33312: Instances with deferred fields cannot be used for copying.
Django
[Django] #36371: JSONField.from_db_value crashes when DB returns parsed JSON despite KeyTransform guard
Django
Re: [Django] #36371: JSONField.from_db_value crashes when DB returns parsed JSON despite KeyTransform guard
Django
Re: [Django] #36371: JSONField.from_db_value crashes when DB returns parsed JSON despite KeyTransform guard
Django
[Django] #36370: Model.objects.get() with a None char parameter intermittently doesn't retrieve row correctly
Django
Re: [Django] #36370: Model.objects.get() with a None char parameter intermittently doesn't retrieve row correctly
Django
[Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #36369: Missing test coverage for FORWARD_PROPERTIES entries
Django
Re: [Django] #32915: ./manage runserver --nostatic still doesn't return a traceback
Django
Re: [Django] #32915: ./manage runserver --nostatic still doesn't return a traceback
Django
Re: [Django] #32915: ./manage runserver --nostatic still doesn't return a traceback
Django
Re: [Django] #32915: ./manage runserver --nostatic still doesn't return a traceback
Django
[Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #36368: `makemessages` command runs `write_po_file()` multiple times for the same potfile
Django
Re: [Django] #12090: Show admin actions on the edit pages too
Django
Re: [Django] #12090: Show admin actions on the edit pages too
Django
Re: [Django] #12090: Show admin actions on the edit pages too
Django
Re: [Django] #12090: Show admin actions on the edit pages too
Django
Re: [Django] #12090: Show admin actions on the edit pages too
Django
Re: [Django] #12090: Show admin actions on the edit pages too
Django
Re: [Django] #26066: Admin listview could handle a table wider than the screen more elegantly
Django
Re: [Django] #27646: Add QuerySet support for group by modifiers and OLAP functionality
Django
Re: [Django] #21604: Embed raw queries as subqueries when used with an __in filter
Django
Re: [Django] #21604: Embed raw queries as subqueries when used with an __in filter
Django
[Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36367: Improving the accessibility of the date_hierarchy layout in the admin.
Django
[Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
Re: [Django] #36366: Improving the accessibility of the pagination layout in the admin.
Django
[Django] #36365: Admin filter_horziontal with formfield_for_manytomany hides existing records
Django
Re: [Django] #36365: Admin filter_horziontal with formfield_for_manytomany hides existing records
Django
Re: [Django] #36365: Admin filter_horziontal with formfield_for_manytomany hides existing records
Django
Re: [Django] #36365: Admin filter_horziontal with formfield_for_manytomany hides existing records
Django
Re: [Django] #36365: Admin filter_horziontal with formfield_for_manytomany hides existing records
Django
Re: [Django] #36365: Admin filter_horziontal with formfield_for_manytomany hides existing records
Django
Re: [Django] #36365: Admin filter_horziontal with formfield_for_manytomany hides existing records
Django
[Django] #36364: Migration executor cannot handle AlterField operation on ForeignObject
Django
Re: [Django] #36364: Migration executor cannot handle AlterField operation on ForeignObject
Django
Re: [Django] #36364: Migration executor cannot handle AlterField operation on ForeignObject
Django
Re: [Django] #36364: Migration executor cannot handle AlterField operation on ForeignObject
Django
Re: [Django] #36364: Migration executor cannot handle AlterField operation on ForeignObject
Django
Re: [Django] #35518: Avoid regex search for simple route patterns
Django
Re: [Django] #35518: Avoid regex search for simple route patterns
Django
Re: [Django] #35518: Avoid regex search for simple route patterns
Django
Re: [Django] #35518: Avoid regex search for simple route patterns
Django
Re: [Django] #33882: Allow transaction.atomic to work in async contexts.
Django
Re: [Django] #33882: Allow transaction.atomic to work in async contexts.
Django
Re: [Django] #33882: Allow transaction.atomic to work in async contexts.
Django
[Django] #36363: List duplicated fields in '(admin.E012) There are duplicate field(s)' error message.
Django
Re: [Django] #36363: List duplicated fields in '(admin.E012) There are duplicate field(s)' error message.
Django
Re: [Django] #36363: List duplicated fields in '(admin.E012) There are duplicate field(s)' error message.
Django
Re: [Django] #36363: List duplicated fields in '(admin.E012) There are duplicate field(s)' error message.
Django
Re: [Django] #36363: List duplicated fields in '(admin.E012) There are duplicate field(s)' error message.
Django
Re: [Django] #36363: List duplicated fields in '(admin.E012) There are duplicate field(s)' error message.
Django
Re: [Django] #36363: List duplicated fields in '(admin.E012) There are duplicate field(s)' error message.
Django
Re: [Django] #36363: List duplicated fields in '(admin.E012) There are duplicate field(s)' error message.
Django
Re: [Django] #36363: List duplicated fields in '(admin.E012) There are duplicate field(s)' error message.
Django
Re: [Django] #36363: List duplicated fields in '(admin.E012) There are duplicate field(s)' error message.
Django
[Django] #36362: Update `pyproject.toml` license metadata to fix setuptools deprecations
Django
Re: [Django] #36362: Update `pyproject.toml` license metadata to fix setuptools deprecations
Django
Re: [Django] #36362: Update `pyproject.toml` license metadata to fix setuptools deprecations
Django
Re: [Django] #32234: inspectdb should inform about composite keys.
Django
Re: [Django] #32234: inspectdb should inform about composite keys.
Django
Re: [Django] #32234: inspectdb should inform about composite keys.
Django
Re: [Django] #32234: inspectdb should inform about composite keys.
Django
Re: [Django] #36052: Add support for CompositePrimaryKey in inspectdb
Django
Re: [Django] #36052: Add support for CompositePrimaryKey in inspectdb
Django
Re: [Django] #36052: Add support for CompositePrimaryKey in inspectdb
Django
Re: [Django] #36052: Add support for CompositePrimaryKey in inspectdb
Django
[Django] #36361: Grouping by date/datetime/time subfields then aggregating causes the sql compiler to explode
Django
Re: [Django] #36361: Grouping by date/datetime/time subfields then aggregating causes the sql compiler to explode
Django
[Django] #36360: KeyError calling `update()` after an `annotate()` and a `values()`
Django
Re: [Django] #36360: KeyError calling `update()` after an `annotate()` and a `values()`
Django
Re: [Django] #36360: KeyError calling `update()` after an `annotate()` and a `values()`
Django
Re: [Django] #36360: KeyError calling `update()` after an `annotate()` and a `values()`
Django
Re: [Django] #36360: KeyError calling `update()` after an `annotate()` and a `values()`
Django
Re: [Django] #36360: KeyError calling `update()` after an `annotate()` and a `values()`
Django
Re: [Django] #36360: KeyError calling `update()` after an `annotate()` and a `values()`
Django
[Django] #36359: id_for_label undefined for AdminReadonlyField
Django
Re: [Django] #36359: id_for_label undefined for AdminReadonlyField
Django
Re: [Django] #36352: values() raises a FieldError when multiple values() of annotated values are chained
Django
Re: [Django] #36352: values() raises a FieldError when multiple values() of annotated values are chained
Django
Re: [Django] #36352: values() raises a FieldError when multiple values() of annotated values are chained
Django
Re: [Django] #36352: values() raises a FieldError when multiple values() of annotated values are chained
Django
[Django] #36358: Tables with composite primary keys including integer columns improperly get introspected as AutoField on SQLite
Django
Re: [Django] #36358: Tables with composite primary keys including integer columns improperly get introspected as AutoField on SQLite
Django
Re: [Django] #36358: Tables with composite primary keys including integer columns improperly get introspected as AutoField on SQLite
Django
Re: [Django] #36358: Tables with composite primary keys including integer columns improperly get introspected as AutoField on SQLite
Django
Re: [Django] #36358: Tables with composite primary keys including integer columns improperly get introspected as AutoField on SQLite
Django
Re: [Django] #36358: Tables with composite primary keys including integer columns improperly get introspected as AutoField on SQLite
Django
Re: [Django] #34429: Allow to set unusable password via admin UI
Django
Re: [Django] #35874: The console directive is not accessible for screenreaders.
Django
Re: [Django] #36356: management command examples incorrectly use django-admin instead of manage.py (was: Error in the documentation)
Django
[Django] #36357: inspectdb creates a redundant unique_together for composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36357: inspectdb creates a redundant unique_together for composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36357: inspectdb creates a redundant unique_together for composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36357: inspectdb creates a redundant unique_together for composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36357: inspectdb creates a redundant unique_together for composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36357: inspectdb creates a redundant unique_together for composite primary keys
Django
Re: [Django] #36357: inspectdb creates a redundant unique_together for composite primary keys
Django
[Django] #36356: Error in the documentation
Django
Re: [Django] #36356: Error in the documentation
Django
Re: [Django] #33620: Accessibility in pipeline
Django
Re: [Django] #33620: Accessibility in pipeline
Django
Re: [Django] #36027: ASGI: Dead persistent postgres connections are not closed when the database is accessed in response_for_exception
Django
Re: [Django] #36027: ASGI: Dead persistent postgres connections are not closed when the database is accessed in response_for_exception
Django
Re: [Django] #36027: ASGI: Dead persistent postgres connections are not closed when the database is accessed in response_for_exception
Django
Re: [Django] #36027: ASGI: Dead persistent postgres connections are not closed when the database is accessed in response_for_exception
Django
Re: [Django] #34746: High CPU/memory consumption when a 5XX is raised with large local variables
Django
[Django] #36355: sqlmigrate gives unexpected output for an AlterField on a PK when another app has a model with a FK
Django
Re: [Django] #36355: sqlmigrate gives unexpected output for an AlterField on a PK when another app has a model with a FK
Django
Re: [Django] #36355: sqlmigrate gives unexpected output for an AlterField on a PK when another app has a model with a FK
Django
Re: [Django] #36143: DatabaseOperations.bulk_batch_size() is overly protective on SQLite in most cases
Django
Re: [Django] #36143: DatabaseOperations.bulk_batch_size() is overly protective on SQLite in most cases
Django
Re: [Django] #36143: DatabaseOperations.bulk_batch_size() is overly protective on SQLite in most cases
Django
Re: [Django] #36143: DatabaseOperations.bulk_batch_size() is overly protective on SQLite in most cases
Django
Re: [Django] #36143: DatabaseOperations.bulk_batch_size() is overly protective on SQLite in most cases
Django
Earlier messages
Later messages