On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 11:12 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: [...] > If it were possible to create a loop from a number (equivalent of > Python's range() function), rather than iterating over a sequence, the > first solution would work without pre-processing. But I can't say that I > dislike the fact you cannot do this.
Wow. My apologies to anybody for whom English is not a native language (or those who have just woken up). The triple negative here is really awkward. I meant to say "I like the current way." > It forces complexity out the > templates: the temptation to use the templates as a computation engine > would become too great otherwise. Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
