On 5/10/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Exactly. That's precisely what I pointed out in the (now closed)
ticket for this feature request. Settings files are pure Python for a
reason -- this sort of flexibility.

Let's move onto more pressing improvements to the framework, shall we?

It would be good for django if work like this is a little more encouraged. Its a good patch, complete with unittests and docs, and if it cant go to django main (even i am on -1 on both and -0 on DSN being the way to specify settings), it sure can go to the examples. We keep on harping the main advantage of using python for settings file is that we can do programmatic stuff in it, what could be better example than a settings.py example which demonstrates this.

All I am saying is dont just throw out a decently done work.

--
Amit Upadhyay
Blog: http://www.rootshell.be/~upadhyay
+91-9867-359-701
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to