One of the challenges of going the GAE route is that you need to modify your application slightly to work with their version of models. Also, you can't ever run this code off of GAE, so it's kind of a lock-in in that respect. That being said it does work very well.
Brian On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Venkatraman S <venka...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Diederik van der Boor > <vdb...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> I'm curious about using Django for many small web sites. Does this >> require each site to run in a separate wsgi daemon process? If so, how >> is it possible to keep memory usage shared? >> > > Not exactly sure when you have to manage the linux box, but if you have to > manage many small sites, i would recommend GAE. > Best for deploying and managing(non sysad work) them without any hassles. > > -V- > http://twitter.com/venkasub > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django users" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<django-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en. > -- Brian Bouterse ITng Services -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
