the django-user (in this case) IS the one who´s writing the code, of course.
Am 03.08.2006 um 00:52 schrieb Malcolm Tredinnick: > > On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 21:45 +0200, patrickk wrote: > [...] >> 3. Unless I´m very much mistaken, there´s already some development >> going on - in order to provide AJAX (Dojo) for the Admin-Interface. >> Since most of the django-users (I guess) will use the Admin- >> Interface, they probably won´t switch to another js-toolkit for their >> site ... well, at least I won´t. > > That argument doesn't really fly too far with me, because you are > talking about two different contexts. > > If I am doing something with "AJAX" (man, I hate the word -- it's so > completely non-specific what I am actually doing), I am going to be > writing code, using a Javascript library (maybe), working on HTML. > > If I'm using the Admin interface, I'm a *user*. I'm not developing the > Admin interface (in this scenario), so how it works can be > sufficiently > advanced as to appear like magic to me. I don't insist that every web > page I view uses the same Javascript toolkit, because it honestly > makes > no difference to the user experience. Even within the set of "things > built on Django" that restriction doesn't really add a lot. > > Malcolm > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
