Hi Andrew, On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Andrew Dalke <andrewda...@gmail.com> wrote: > I must say that I looked at the code with some dismay. Not because of > the code, but because it looks like it's a *lot* of work to handle > UDFs. I had hoped it would be much easier.
I'm sure the code could be simplified and polished (and there are some parts that I know to require some substantial rework).. now that I have a working prototype and I spent some time reading the sources I was just about to start asking some more specific question on the list, but my impression was that if explicit support for this kind of specializations already existed, then django-gis would have used that. >> Depending on your plans, it >> would be interesting if we could collaborate on this. > > [...] > > So yes, I'm interested (though I would implement a comparable OEChem > back-end), but no, it's not going to be in the next few months. Sounds fine, I will also be attending EuroPython next June, so at the latest we might have a chance to talk again about this on that occasion. Cheers, Riccardo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
