On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Have you considered using an atomic caching server for storing the state of > an IPs 'throttle' count? > It has the added benefit of giving you future support for distributed use, > wouldn't be as performance heavy as writing to a database, and deals with > any race condition problems quite nicely. >
No, I haven't. We're not using caching otherwise, and don't have any needs for distributed use right now. And, sqlite3 in memory is ridiculously fast, so I don't believe performance will ever be an issue there. I see you alluded to that in your follow-up post. I haven't benchmarked it, but it's more than fast enough for my needs. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
