OK...adding the .pk=None did the trick, but why didn't I have to do
this on the outer loop?

On Dec 8, 11:52 am, Brian Schott <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think if you set:
> new_cmd_str.id = None
> That will force a new PK.  Not sure why the CmdString constructor isn't 
> clearing this..
>
> Brian Schott
> [email protected]
>
> On Dec 8, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Marc Edwards wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I'm looping through some JSON code and generating new model instances
> > that I am saving to my SQLiteDB.
>
> > I have 3 nested "for" loops, like this:
>
> >    for app_catalog in JSON_Object['TSS_WorkFlow_Catalog']:
> >        for eda_app in app_catalog['EDA_App']:
> >            new_eda_app =
> > EDA_App(isv=eda_app['isv'],product_name=eda_app['product_name'],product_cat 
> > egory=eda_app['product_category'])
> >            new_eda_app.save()
> >            for cmd_str_pair in eda_app['CmdStrings']['name']:
> >                new_cmd_str = CmdString(name=cmd_str_pair['Text'],
> > cmd=cmd_str_pair['Value'], eda_app=new_eda_app)
> >                new_cmd_str.save()
>
> > My JSON file has 3 EDA_Apps, each EDA_App has 3, 4, and 4 CmdStrings,
> > respectively.
>
> > When I loop through the second nested "for" for the CmdStrings,
> > the .save() is writing to the same model instance, and at the end of
> > the first nested "for" loop, I have 3 CmdString instances in my DB,
> > NOT 3+4+4=11 CmdString instances.
>
> > Since my DB has 3 EDA_Apps in the DB, I think that the code to
> > instance a new model instance to save to the DB seems to be fine. It
> > is the second nested "for" loop that is acting fishy.  I don't know if
> > I am doing something wrong relative to the DB, because when I step
> > through the 2nd nested "for" loop, I can clearly see the "new_cmd_str"
> > taking on the next values from the JSON file.  This must be related to
> > how I am using the DB.
>
> > When I try using .save(force_insert=True) on the 2nd nested "for" loop
> > save, I receive a Django DEBUG page message that the "PRIMARY KEY must
> > be unique".
>
> > Any thoughts or observations on my code style?
>
> > Kind regards, Marc
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Django users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to