I'm not extremely well-versed in Django by any means, but we're
currently looking for a framework that can replace our existing
.NET-based website and control system. We get anywhere between 80,000
hits a day (average) but can unexpectedly spike to several times that
many in a very, very short period of time with most of the hits
impacting 2-3 files. Obviously, even with a significant server setup,
IIS and .NET can quickly get overwhelmed.

I'm not convinced the cacheing aspects of Django's cache would be
suitable for this. I realize memcached is great (and have used it
elsewhere), but doesn't that method still require the request to go
through Django and Python?

Ideally, I'd like to use a filesystem cache that went directly through
the webserver but would fall through to Django if the cached file
doesn't exist. Is this possible?

Example:

/wx/hurricane/Ernesto_Track would normally go through Django to fetch
and render. If, however, /wx/hurricane/Ernesto_Track already exists as
a real file, I'd like the webserver (Apache2) to just delivery the file
without any Django overhead. Updates through Django could detect and
expire the cache, as could a cron task.

Any tips?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to