On 10/18/06 19:57, Steve M wrote: > I've been following this and related threads with some interest. I > think it would be nice to have a pure python (requiring no setup of, > e.g., Apache) webserver included with Django that was more capable than > the current Django development server. I recently stumbled across this: > > http://pythonpaste.org/module-paste.httpserver.html > > It is a multi-threaded WSGI webserver. It comes with paste, which by > the way seems to have a lot to offer, but even if the whole of paste > cannot be cleanly integrated with Django, doesn't the theory of WSGI > imply that it should be trivial to get a Django project running on this > server? I assume you would pass django.core.handlers.WSGIHandler to the > paste.httpserver.serve() function, although I haven't looked enough to > see how to connect it with a specific project. > > So how realistic is it to replace the Django development server > (assuming licenses permit) with this server? Any reason it wouldn't be > desirable? I guess the single threaded devel server could make > debugging some problems less complex? Maybe I should just give it a > shot. >
http://pythonpaste.org/djangopaste/ http://trac.pythonpaste.org/pythonpaste/browser/Paste/DjangoPaste --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
