Hi Felix, I just had a look at proxy models. Nice stuff, but it's not what I am looking for.
I need to be able to give each "instance" an individual value. Hmmmmm.... Am Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2015 19:17:07 UTC+2 schrieb felix: > > El 10/06/15 12:33, ThomasTheDjangoFan escribió: > > Hi Bruno, > > Abstract Base Models come close but they don't allow me to combine > multiple instances of the BaseModel in the DataHolderModel. > > My goal is to store them all in one table without having to manually add > all the fields. > > Any suggestions? > > > Am Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2015 17:49:13 UTC+2 schrieb Bruno A.: >> >> It looks like you want a Model to inherit from multiple base model? >> Multiple time from the same one, with different parameters? >> >> I'm not sure I understood what you are trying to do, but maybe abstract >> models can help you? >> >> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.8/topics/db/models/#abstract-base-classes >> >> >> On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 22:20:19 UTC+1, ThomasTheDjangoFan wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> now this is kind of hard for me to explain, I hope that somebody >>> understands what I actually want. >>> >>> I am a python newbie and wonder if there is an easy solution. >>> >>> *They say: DRY!!* >>> >>> >>> >>> *My question is: How do a define an (abstract?) class including methods >>> and fields and then attach it to a real mode with variants instants?* >>> >>> * The data needs to be available as realy models.* types, so I can use >>> it in forms.* >>> >>> Hopefully this example makes it clear: >>> >>> >>> # I would love to keep it DRY and wonder if there is a solution for this >>> in python? >>> >>> # NOW THIS IS TOTALLY MADE UP >>> # Basically I would like to be able to define a definition of >>> model-fields and functions >>> # and then be able to "attach" it to a model as various instances >>> class KidType (models.Model): >>> NAMEHOLDER = '' #nameholder >>> >>> NAMEHOLDER_text = models.TextField() >>> NAMEHOLDER_timestamp_updated = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add= >>> False, auto_now=True) >>> >>> def example_function_shared_among_types(): >>> return str(self.NAMEHOLDER_text + self. >>> NAMEHOLDER_timestamp_updated) >>> >>> def set_NAMEHOLDER_text(value): >>> self.set_NAMEHOLDER_text(value) >>> >>> # >>> class DataHolderModel(models.Model): >>> # Attach the above definition with different names >>> # and make them accessable >>> @attach (KidType, KidType.NAME = 'dataset1') >>> @attach (KidType, KidType.NAME = 'dataset2') >>> @attach (KidType, KidType.NAME = 'dataset3') >>> >>> # Access the instances within the HolderModel: >>> data_holder = DataHolderModel() >>> data_holder.dataset1_text = 'value1' >>> data_holder.set_dataset1_text('value1') >>> data_holder.dataset2_text = 'value2' >>> data_holder.dataset3_text = 'value3' >>> >>> Any ideas? Can I do something like this? >>> >>> I am really thankful for your tips >>> Thomas >>> >>> >>> > If its the same data and maybe with different behaviour then proxy models > could be what you want. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-users/e422e01e-2517-4388-b4ca-6066644aeb28%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
