> If it was me wanting to generate a static site like this (I had to go > and look up what SCORM was), I would use the wget solution. It's fast > and a is going to extract pretty much exactly what a generic user will > see (the differences will be if you have any content that varies on > cookies or browser strings, mainly). Still, I'm a command-line junkie, > so my preferences may not be typical.
Cool. I appreciate the feedback. This was did seem easier after writing the two options but I wasn't sure if there might be some benefit from doing it within Python. Our pages do correspond to rows in a database but if there's no advantage, wget does seem cheap and easy. Thanks, Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
